Harry Potter VS. Twilight



Daniel "Harry Potter" Radcliffe and Robert "Edward Cullen" Pattinson.



THIS ARTICLE MADE ME REALLY MAD. It was definitely a little bit biased and against Harry Potter, while I'm biased and against Twilight. I think it was a tad biased because it only retrieved opinions from 13-year old girls, who are the primary audience of Twilight movies and books. I think the article would have been more accurate had it included an opinion from a guy or from an older and more mature girl. If the writers of the article had done so, it definitely may have sounded less one-sided. The Twilight books do, in my opinion, have some depth and the author does know how to write extremely well. But since I've read both Harry Potter and Twilight, I can compare and say that the Harry Potter books were written better and keep you a lot more entertained and withdrawn, whereas I thought Twilight had a lot of boring parts and didn't keep me interested. The Twilight BOOKS are okay and the Harry Potter books are amazing, but I think the Twilight movies are horrible. The acting is awful and the production made the "okay" books look even worse. I won't argue that the Harry Potter movies are better than the books, because that is rarely the case with a really good book, but the movies are definitely a whole lot better than Twilight movies.

Harry Potter VS. Twilight Article